Implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and improve the level of implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Qualitative study. We performed a narrative literature review to identify the recommendations for the psychological management of SpA and associated IBD and to explore their level of implementation. Based on the findings, we developed a national survey to assess: (1) current level of knowledge and implementation of the recommendations; (2) attitudes towards the recommendations; and (3) barriers and facilitators to their implementation. The results of the review and survey were discussed by a multidisciplinary group of 9 expert rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, who defined implementation strategies to increase the uptake of the recommendations. RESULTS: The review included 4 articles, 2 of them included direct recommendations on the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with SpA and IBD. None assessed the level of implementation of the recommendations in routine clinical practice. Our survey showed a great lack of awareness and implementation of the recommendations, even though psychological issues are very relevant for health professionals. Lack of time, resources, and knowledge are considered the main barriers to adherence to the recommendations. We propose several implementation strategies related to educational activities, clinical practice, and others to increase the uptake of reported recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Further research and efforts are required to achieve behaviour changes in clinical practice to improve the identification and management of psychological problems and needs in patients with SpA and IBD.

Implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease / Implementación de las recomendaciones para el manejo psicológico de pacientes con espondiloartritis y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Objective: To assess and improve the level of implementation of the recommendations for the psychological management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and associated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Qualitative study. We performed a narrative literature review to identify the recommendations for the psychological management of SpA and associated IBD and to explore their level of implementation. Based on the findings, we developed a national survey to assess: (1) current level of knowledge and implementation of the recommendations; (2) attitudes towards the recommendations; and (3) barriers and facilitators to their implementation. The results of the review and survey were discussed by a multidisciplinary group of 9 expert rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, who defined implementation strategies to increase the uptake of the recommendations. Results: The review included 4 articles, 2 of them included direct recommendations on the identification and management of psychological problems in patients with SpA and IBD. None assessed the level of implementation of the recommendations in routine clinical practice. Our survey showed a great lack of awareness and implementation of the recommendations, even though psychological issues are very relevant for health professionals. Lack of time, resources, and knowledge are considered the main barriers to adherence to the recommendations. We propose several implementation strategies related to educational activities, clinical practice, and others to increase the uptake of reported recommendations. Conclusions: Further research and efforts are required to achieve behaviour changes in clinical practice to improve the identification and management of psychological problems and needs in patients with SpA and IBD. (AU)

Objetivo: Analizar y mejorar la implementación de las recomendaciones sobre la evaluación y el manejo psicológico de pacientes con espondiloartritis (EspA) y enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) asociada. Métodos: Estudio cualitativo. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura para identificar las recomendaciones sobre el manejo psicológico de pacientes con EspA y EII asociada y explorar su grado de implementación. En base a ello se diseñó una encuesta para analizar el nivel de conocimiento de las recomendaciones, las barreras y los facilitadores a su implementación. Todos los resultados fueron discutidos por un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos reumatólogos y gastroenterólogos que definieron estrategias para incrementar el seguimiento de las recomendaciones. Resultados: La revisión incluyó 4 artículos, de los que 2 aportan recomendaciones directas sobre la evaluación y el manejo psicológico de pacientes con EspA y EII. Ninguno ha evaluado el grado de implementación de las recomendaciones en la práctica diaria. La encuesta mostró que el conocimiento de las mismas y la implementación de estas recomendaciones son prácticamente nulos a pesar de ser un tema muy relevante para los profesionales que manejan estos pacientes. La falta de tiempo, la escasez de recursos y la falta de reconocimiento se consideran las principales barreras para la correcta identificación y manejo de los aspectos psicológicos en pacientes con EspA y EII. Se proponen una serie de actividades formativas y relacionadas con la práctica clínica para mejorar esta situación. Conclusiones: Se precisa seguir trabajando en la implementación para conseguir cambios en la práctica diaria para mejorar la evaluación y el manejo psicológico de los pacientes con EspA y EII. (AU)

Management of Specific Clinical Profiles in Axial Spondyloarthritis: An Expert's Document Based on a Systematic Literature Review and Extended Delphi Process.

INTRODUCTION: The management of specific clinical scenarios is not adequately addressed in national and international guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Expert opinions could serve as a valuable complement to these documents. METHODS: Seven expert rheumatologists identified controversial areas or gaps of current recommendations for the management of patients with axSpA. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to analyze the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs, b/tsDMARDs) in axSpA regarding controversial areas or gaps. In a nominal group meeting, the results of the SLR were discussed and a set of statements were proposed. A Delphi process inviting 150 rheumatologists was followed to define the final statements. Agreement was defined as if at least 70% of the participants voted ≥ 7 (from 1, totally disagree, to 10, totally agree). RESULTS: Three overarching principles and 17 recommendations were generated. All reached agreement. According to them, axSpA care should be holistic and individualized, taking into account objective findings, comorbidities, and patients' opinions and preferences. Integrating imaging and clinical assessment with biomarker analysis could also help in decision-making. Connected to treatments, in refractory enthesitis, b/tsDMARDs are recommended. If active peripheral arthritis, csDMARD might be considered before b/tsDMARDs. The presence of significant structural damage, long disease duration, or HLA-B27-negative status do not contraindicate for the use of b/tsDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to complement guidelines by helping health professionals address and manage specific groups of patients, particular clinical scenarios, and gaps in axSpA.

Necesidades, impacto y perspectiva actual de los pacientes con espondiloartritis incluyendo la artritis psoriásica / Patients with spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis: Current needs, impact, and perspective

Objetivo: Analizar las necesidades, el impacto y la perspectiva actual de las personas con espondiloartritis (EspA) incluyendo la artritis psoriásica (APs). Métodos: Encuesta nacional en formato electrónico dirigida a pacientes con EspA y APs. Se abrió en abril de 2021 utilizando los distintos canales de la Coordinadora Española de Asociaciones de Espondiloartritis para comunicarse con sus socios, y se cerró en junio de 2021. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, y variables relacionadas con los objetivos propuestos. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo. Resultados: Se incluyeron 834 pacientes: 543 con EspA (sin APs) y 291 con APs. En el último mes, la media de fatiga, rigidez matutina y problemas de sueño fue >8 (0: nada; 10: mucho). Casi el 80% de los pacientes con EspA refieren dolor lumbar bajo, y el 82,5% de los pacientes con APs, afectación de rodillas, tobillos, pies y/o manos, y el 51%, dactilitis. El grado de satisfacción con el tratamiento fue medio-bajo: media 5,5 en las EspA y 6,2 en la APs (escala 0-10), y más alto con las terapias biológicas (medias >6-7). El 70,2% de los pacientes con EspA y el 66% con APs se han acostumbrado a vivir con dolor diario. El 43,8% de los encuestados con EspA y el 31,2% con APs refieren que no marcan los objetivos del tratamiento con el médico. Conclusiones: Actualmente el impacto de la EspA y de la APs en múltiples aspectos del día a día sigue siendo muy alto. Existen áreas de mejora en la relación médico-paciente y con los tratamientos.(AU)

Objective: To analyse the current needs of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and the impact of the conditions. Methods: National survey in electronic format for patients with SpA and PsA. The survey was launched on April 28, 2021, using the channels of the Coordinadora Española de Asociaciones de Espondiloartritis (Spanish Coordinator of Associations of Spondyloarthritis) to communicate with members and followers, and was closed on June 30, 2021. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected (age, sex, disease duration, treatments), and variables related to the objectives. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: A total of 543 patients with SpA and 291 with PsA were included. In the previous month, on a scale from 0-10 (0: none; 10: very high) the mean scores of fatigue, morning stiffness, and sleep problems were all >8. Almost 80% of the patients with SpA reported low back pain and 82.5% of the patients with PsA reported involvement of the knees, ankles, feet and/or hands, and 51% dactylitis. The level of satisfaction with the treatment was low, mean 5.5 in SpA and 6.2 in PsA (scale 0-10). It was higher with biological therapies. We found that 70.2% of patients with SpA and 66% with PsA were used to living with pain every day. Finally, 43.8% of participants with SpA and 31.2% of those with PsA reported that they did not set the treatment goals with their doctors. Conclusions: Currently the impact of SpA and PsA on multiple aspects of daily life is still very high. There are areas for improvement in the doctor-patient relationship and in treatments.(AU)

Patients with spondyloarthritis including psoriatic arthritis: Current needs, impact, and perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the current needs of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and the impact of the conditions. METHODS: National survey in electronic format for patients with SpA and PsA. The survey was launched on April 28, 2021, using the channels of the Coordinadora Española de Asociaciones de Espondiloartritis (Spanish Coordinator of Associations of Spondyloarthritis) to communicate with members and followers, and was closed on June 30, 2021. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected (age, sex, disease duration, treatments), and variables related to the objectives. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 543 patients with SpA and 291 with PsA were included. In the previous month, on a scale from 0 to 10 (0: none; 10: very high) the mean scores of fatigue, morning stiffness, and sleep problems were all >8. Almost 80% of the patients with SpA reported low back pain and 82.5% of the patients with PsA reported involvement of the knees, ankles, feet and/or hands, and 51% dactylitis. The level of satisfaction with the treatment was low, mean 5.5 in SpA and 6.2 in PsA (scale 0-10). It was higher with biological therapies. We found that 70.2% of patients with SpA and 66% with PsA were used to living with pain every day. Finally, 43.8% of participants with SpA and 31.2% of those with PsA reported that they did not set the treatment goals with their doctors. CONCLUSIONS: Currently the impact of SpA and PsA on multiple aspects of daily life is still very high. There are areas for improvement in the doctor-patient relationship and in treatments.

Implementation of recommendations in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: considerations for development and uptake.

A clinical guideline is a document with the aim of guiding decisions based on evidence regarding diagnosis, management and treatment in specific areas of healthcare. Specific to rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), adherence to clinical guidelines recommendations impacts the outcomes of people with these diseases. However, currently, the implementation of recommendations is less than optimal in rheumatology.The WHO has described the implementation of evidence-based recommendations as one of the greatest challenges facing the global health community and has identified the importance of scaling up these recommendations. But closing the evidence-to-practice gap is often complex, time-consuming and difficult. In this context, the implementation science offers a framework to overcome this scenario.This article describes the principles of implementation science to facilitate and optimise the implementation of clinical recommendations in RMDs. Embedding implementation science methods and techniques into recommendation development and daily practice can help maximise the likelihood that implementation is successful in improving the quality of healthcare and healthcare services.

Comorbidity identification and referral in atopic dermatitis: a consensus document.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with different comorbidities. OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based and practical recommendations for comorbidity detection in patients with AD in daily practice. METHODS: We employed a modified RAND/UCLA methodology, including a systematic literature review (SLR). A group of six experts on AD was established. We conducted a comprehensive search strategy on Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to June 2020. The selection criteria included studies with AD patients with any comorbidity reporting data on comorbidity prevalence, burden, and management. The included studies quality was assessed. The SLR results were discussed in a nominal group meeting, and several recommendations were generated. The recommendation agreement grade was tested on additional experts through a Delphi process. RESULTS: The recommendations cover the following issues: (1) Which comorbidities should be investigated at the first and subsequent visits; (2) how and when should comorbidities be investigated (screening); (3) how should patients with specific comorbidities be referred to confirm their diagnosis and initiate management; (4) specific recommendations to ensure an integral care approach for AD patients with any comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations seek to guide dermatologists, patients, and other stakeholders in regard to early comorbidity identification and AD patient referral to improve decision-making.

Use of parenteral methotrexate in rheumatic diseases: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy, adherence, patient satisfaction, safety, pharmacodynamics and cost-effectiveness of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was carried out in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central from the beginning until June 2019. Studies including adult patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with parenteral MTX were identified and data on efficacy, adherence, satisfaction, safety, pharmacokinetics, and cost-effectiveness analysed. As for the designs, systematic reviews, clinical trials, or observational studies were permitted, including cross-sectional and small-sample studies if they were pharmacokinetic studies. RESULTS: Out of 4160 identified articles, 80 articles were finally included. The efficacy profile of parenteral MTX seems useful in general and in those patients with insufficient response to oral MTX. The parenteral route does not seem to increase the rate or severity of adverse events due to the use of MTX. The use of parenteral MTX is an appropriate way to reduce costs in patients with inadequate response to oral MTX. Adherence and satisfaction are favoured by training programmes in the use of the parenteral route. The results in rheumatic diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are very scarce and do not enable obtaining conclusive data. CONCLUSIONS: Parenteral MTX can be an alternative to the use of oral MTX, due to its profile of efficacy, safety, adherence and pharmacoeconomic results, especially in those patients with RA.

Revisión sistemática del uso de metotrexato por vía parenteral en enfermedades reumáticas / Use of Parenteral Methotrexate in Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review

Objetivo: Analizar la eficacia, adherencia, satisfacción del paciente, seguridad, farmacodinámica y costo-efectividad del metotrexato (MTX) parenteral en pacientes con enfermedades reumáticas. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática basada en una estrategia de búsqueda en Medline, Embase y Cochrane Library (inicio-06/2019). Se identificaron estudios que incluyeran pacientes adultos con enfermedades reumáticas en tratamiento con MTX parenteral y que analizaran datos de eficacia, adherencia, satisfacción, seguridad, farmacocinética o costo-efectividad. En cuanto a los diseños se permitieron revisiones sistemáticas, ensayos clínicos o estudios observacionales, incluyendo transversales y estudios con muestras pequeñas si eran estudios de farmacocinética. Resultados: De 4.160 artículos identificados, se incluyeron finalmente 80. El MTX parenteral parece útil de manera general y en especial en aquellos pacientes con respuesta insuficiente a MTX oral. La vía parenteral no parece aumentar la tasa ni la gravedad de los eventos adversos con respecto a la oral y podría reducir costes en aquellos pacientes con respuesta inadecuada a MTX oral. La adherencia y satisfacción se ven favorecidas por programas de entrenamiento en la vía parenteral. Los resultados en enfermedades reumáticas distintas a la artritis reumatoide (AR) son muy escasos y no permiten obtener datos concluyentes. Conclusiones: El MTX por vía parenteral podría ser una alternativa al uso de MTX oral, por su perfil de eficacia, seguridad, adherencia, satisfacción y resultados fármaco-económicos, especialmente en pacientes con AR.(AU)

Objective: To analyse the efficacy, adherence, patient satisfaction, safety, pharmacodynamics and cost-effectiveness of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatic diseases. Methods: A systematic review of literature was carried out in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central from the beginning until June 2019. Studies including adult patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with parenteral MTX were identified and data on efficacy, adherence, satisfaction, safety, pharmacokinetics, and cost-effectiveness analysed. As for the designs, systematic reviews, clinical trials, or observational studies were permitted, including cross-sectional and small-sample studies if they were pharmacokinetic studies. Results: Out of 4160 identified articles, 80 articles were finally included. The efficacy profile of parenteral MTX seems useful in general and in those patients with insufficient response to oral MTX. The parenteral route does not seem to increase the rate or severity of adverse events due to the use of MTX. The use of parenteral MTX is an appropriate way to reduce costs in patients with inadequate response to oral MTX. Adherence and satisfaction are favoured by training programmes in the use of the parenteral route. The results in rheumatic diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are very scarce and do not enable obtaining conclusive data. Conclusions: Parenteral MTX can be an alternative to the use of oral MTX, due to its profile of efficacy, safety, adherence and pharmacoeconomic results, especially in those patients with RA.(AU)

Current state, control, impact and management of rheumatoid arthritis according to patient: AR 2020 national survey.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse current status, control and impact of RA on patients' lives as well as the management of RA symptoms. METHODS: A structured anonymous online questionnaire was designed and sent to patients with RA, aged 18 years or above living in Spain. Participants were invited though different strategies: 1) ConArtritis and related patients associations; 2) Patients participating in the platform www.in-pacient.es; 3) Links from ConArtritis website and open social networks. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, as well as others related to the objectives were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: We analysed 882 RA patients, 89% women, with a median age of 52 years, 31.9% disease duration <5 years. They reported a mean pain and patient global disease score (0-10) of 5.1 and 4.9 respectively. The rate of patients with many difficulties or inability to perform daily tasks varied from 6.4% to 49.2%. Based on the activity index 56.8% of patients reported high activity. We found a great or severe impact on the emotional well-being in 31.5% of patients, and of 29.2% in the workplace or academic setting. A total of 87.9% are taking some medication for RA, and 17.3% are little/not satisfied with them. In addition, 67.1% take conventional synthetic disease modifying drugs (DMARDs), and 45.9% biological therapies including biosimilars and small molecules. CONCLUSIONS: The current impact of RA on patients' daily lives remains very high. A significant number of patients are not taking DMARDs (conventional synthetic and/or biologics) despite high activity.

Estado, control, impacto y manejo actual de la artritis reumatoide según los pacientes: encuesta nacional AR 2020 / Current State, Control, Impact and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis According to Patient: AR 2020 National Survey

Objetivos: Analizar el estado, el control, el impacto y el manejo actual de la artritis reumatoide (AR) según los pacientes. Métodos: Encuesta para la que se envió un cuestionario estructurado, anónimo, en formato electrónico a pacientes adultos con AR residentes en España, a través de: 1) Con Artritis o sus asociaciones; 2) pacientes de la plataforma www.in-pacient.es, y 3) vínculos desde la página web de Con Artritis y redes sociales abiertas. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas, y otras relacionadas con los objetivos propuestos. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo. Resultados: Analizamos a 882 pacientes, 89% mujeres, con una edad mediana de 52 años, 31,9% AR <5 años de evolución. El dolor y la valoración global de la enfermedad actuales medios (0-10) fueron de 5,1 y 4,9, respectivamente. El porcentaje de pacientes con muchas dificultades o imposibilidad para realizar tareas cotidianas varió del 6,4 al 49,2%. Con base en el índice de actividad, el 56,8% de los pacientes presenta alta actividad. Los pacientes refieren mucho impacto o impacto grave del 31,5% a nivel emocional, o del 29,2% en el ámbito laboral o académico. El 87,9% sigue algún tratamiento para la AR y el 17,3% está poco/nada satisfecho con el mismo. El 67,1% toma fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME) sintéticos convencionales y el 45,9%, terapias biológicas incluyendo biosimilares y pequeñas moléculas. Conclusiones: El impacto actual de la AR en la vida del paciente sigue siendo muy alto. Un porcentaje significativo de pacientes no sigue un tratamiento con FAME (sintéticos convencionales o biológicos) a pesar de su actividad.(AU)

Objectives: To analyse current status, control and impact of RA on patients’ lives as well as the management of RA symptoms. Methods: A structured anonymous online questionnaire was designed and sent to patients with RA, aged 18 years or above living in Spain. Participants were invited though different strategies: 1) ConArtritis and related patients associations; 2) Patients participating in the platform www.in-pacient.es; 3) Links from ConArtritis website and open social networks. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, as well as others related to the objectives were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: We analysed 882 RA patients, 89% women, with a median age of 52 years, 31.9% disease duration <5 years. They reported a mean pain and patient global disease score (0-10) of 5.1 and 4.9 respectively. The rate of patients with many difficulties or inability to perform daily tasks varied from 6.4% to 49.2%. Based on the activity index 56.8% of patients reported high activity. We found a great or severe impact on the emotional well-being in 31.5% of patients, and of 29.2% in the workplace or academic setting. A total of 87.9% are taking some medication for RA, and 17.3% are little / not satisfied with them. In addition, 67.1% take conventional synthetic disease modifying drugs (DMARDs), and 45.9% biological therapies including biosimilars and small molecules. Conclusions: The current impact of RA on patients’ daily lives remains very high. A significant number of patients are not taking DMARDs (conventional synthetic and / or biologics) despite high activity.(AU)

Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Psoriatic Arthritis: Systematic Literature Review and Results From the CARMA Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in a systematic literature review (SLR) and in the Spanish CArdiovascular in RheuMAtology (CARMA) cohort. METHODS: A SLR and a subanalysis of the CARMA cohort were performed. In the SLR, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to March 2019 were searched. Systematic literature reviews, clinical trials, and observational studies that analyzed the prevalence or frequency of MetS in PsA were analyzed. Two reviewers selected the articles, assessed the quality of the studies, and collected data, independently. In addition, data on sociodemographic characteristics and MetS in patients with PsA from the CARMA cohort were collected and analyzed. Comparative descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: The SLR included 18 articles, of moderate to high quality, with PsA patients of both sexes, with mean ages between 42 and 59 years. The rate of MetS varied from 23.5% to 62.9%. The most commonly used classification method was that of the National Cholesterol Education Program. Additionally, 724 PsA patients from the CARMA cohort were analyzed; 327 (45.4%) were women, 157 (21.8%) smokers, with a mean age of 51 years and a mean PsA disease duration of 9 years. Hypertension was the most common abnormal finding (66.8%), followed by hyperglycemia (42.6%) and hypertriglyceridemia (30.6%). Notably, 222 patients (30.6%) had MetS. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MetS in PsA varies, depending on the definition. Whereas 23.5% to 62.9% of PsA patients have MetS, in the CARMA cohort almost a third of patients with PsA have MetS.

Local adaptation of recommendation-based materials for shared decision-making and management of comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe local adaptations of materials derived from evidence-based recommendations in a training programme in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The eRA (evolving the management of rheumatoid arthritis) programme generated shared decision-making practises and a checklist for managing comorbidity in RA, among others, at the international level. Unmet needs in RA management were first identified and prioritised. Then educational materials were designed and developed to address these gaps. These materials were evaluated in detailed and discussed in small regional groups by practicing rheumatologists. Voting, open discussions and recommendations were extracted from the meetings. RESULTS: Thirty-five Spanish rheumatologists discussed a comorbidity checklist and a shared decision-making tool. The results of the local meetings were synthesised as (1) a judicious commitment to check agreed comorbidities, and (2) a list of barriers and facilitators for the implementation of shared decision making in the local settings. With regards to ways to implement the agreed list and periodicity, two issues stand-out: (1) patient education and (2) the need of easy access to information and the use of local organisational systems in place. With respect to shared decision-making, issues raised included messages for self-awareness, challenges, and practical facilitators. CONCLUSIONS: Discussion, adaptation, and planning are needed before implementing any evidence-based recommendation and materials if we want to achieve a successful implementation. Further studies should demonstrate whether this initiative was successful in achieving the goals of improved patient care. Our experience could be used as a guidance or example for implementation elsewhere.

Comparative results of the implementation in daily practice of an evaluation checklist for patients with axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse and compare changes in the collection of clinical variables after the implementation in daily practice of an evaluation checklist for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: An observational study was performed based on medical records review. The number and type of variables of the evaluation checklist in the medical records were collected. The first review was made before the implementation of the checklist, and the second one 6 months after the implementation (in different patients). A descriptive and bivariate analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Six hospitals and 11 rheumatologists participated. A total of 83 and 68 medical records were reviewed before and after the implementation of the checklist. After the implementation, in the axSpA patients, a significant increase was recorded in alcohol consumption, diarrhoea or IBD and urethritis, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, depression, obesity or gout/hyperuricaemia, weight, height, blood pressure, patient and physician global assessments of disease activity, BASDAI and DAS28. And, in the PsA patients, alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, disease, gout/hyperuricaemia, thoracic expansion, cervical rotation, weight, height, blood pressure, patient and physician global assessments of disease, ASDAS, BASDAI, and BASFI were recorded. In general, there was a trend towards greater recording in axSpA compared with PsA. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a specific checklist in daily practice improves the evaluation of patients with axSpA and PsA. More efforts are necessary to continue improving the evaluation of patients with axSpA, but especially of those with PsA.

Management of particular clinical situations in psoriatic arthritis: an expert's recommendation document based on systematic literature review and extended Delphi process.

To establish practical recommendations for the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with particular clinical situations that might lead to doubts in the pharmacological decision-making. A group of six expert rheumatologists on PsA identified particular clinical situations in PsA. Then, a systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to analyse the efficacy and safety of csDMARDs, b/tsDMARDs in PsA. In a nominal group meeting, the results of the SLR were discussed and a set of recommendations were proposed for a Delphi process. A total of 65 rheumatologists were invited to participate in the Delphi. Agreement was defined if ≥ 70% of the participants voted ≥ 7 (from 1, totally disagree to 10, totally agree). For each recommendation, the level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established based on the Oxford Evidence-Based Medicine categorisation. Particular clinical situations included monoarthritis, axial disease, or non-musculoskeletal manifestations. The SLR finally comprised 131 articles. A total of 16 recommendations were generated, all but 1 reached consensus. According to them, it is crucial to carefully analyse the impact of individual manifestations on patients (disability, quality of life, etc.), but also to recognise the impact of each drug singularities on selected clinical phenotypes to adopt the most appropriate treatment strategy. Early diagnosis and treatment to target approach, along with a close risk management, is also necessary. These recommendations are intended to complement gaps in national and international guidelines by helping health professionals address and manage particular clinical situations in PsA.

Use of Parenteral Methotrexate in Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review. / Revisión sistemática del uso de metotrexato por vía parenteral en enfermedades reumáticas.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy, adherence, patient satisfaction, safety, pharmacodynamics and cost-effectiveness of parenteral methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was carried out in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central from the beginning until June 2019. Studies including adult patients with rheumatic diseases being treated with parenteral MTX were identified and data on efficacy, adherence, satisfaction, safety, pharmacokinetics, and cost-effectiveness analysed. As for the designs, systematic reviews, clinical trials, or observational studies were permitted, including cross-sectional and small-sample studies if they were pharmacokinetic studies. RESULTS: Out of 4160 identified articles, 80 articles were finally included. The efficacy profile of parenteral MTX seems useful in general and in those patients with insufficient response to oral MTX. The parenteral route does not seem to increase the rate or severity of adverse events due to the use of MTX. The use of parenteral MTX is an appropriate way to reduce costs in patients with inadequate response to oral MTX. Adherence and satisfaction are favoured by training programmes in the use of the parenteral route. The results in rheumatic diseases other than rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are very scarce and do not enable obtaining conclusive data. CONCLUSIONS: Parenteral MTX can be an alternative to the use of oral MTX, due to its profile of efficacy, safety, adherence and pharmacoeconomic results, especially in those patients with RA.

Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts' recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) screening tools, examine their implementation in daily practice, and reach a consensus about the best screening tool for implementation in daily practice in different medical settings. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR), structured telephone interviews to hospitals, and a multidisciplinary nominal group meeting were all conducted. The SLR employed sensitive search strategies using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to January 2020. Two reviewers independently selected articles that reported data on PsA screening tools and that included sufficient data to at least calculate the sensitivity and specificity of those tools (e.g., questionnaires, algorithms, specific questions, and biomarkers). The hospital interviews collected data regarding the process of suspected PsA diagnosis and referral to rheumatology, the implementation of PsA screening tools, and barriers and facilitators to implementation of those tools. In the nominal group meeting, a multidisciplinary team of experts discussed all these data and subsequently recommended a screening tool for implementation. RESULTS: The SLR included 41 moderate-quality studies that analyzed 14 PsA screening tools, most of which were questionnaire-based tools. All of these studies reported a moderate-good performance but presented different characteristics regarding the time to completion or the number and type of items or questions. The implementation of screening tools was low (30.5%). The experts ultimately recommended regular use of a PsA screening tool, preferably the PURE-4 questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of PsA screening tools like the PURE-4 questionnaire in daily practice likely improves the prognosis of PsA patients.

Response to interleukin-6 receptor antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is independent of the number of prior used TNF inhibitors: A systematic review and metaanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether early response to tocilizumab (TCZ) and sarilumab (SAR) therapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is influenced by previous use of biologic agents. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis of original studies that analyzed the effectiveness of TCZ or SRL in subgroups of RA patients, including biologic-naïve patients versus those with inadequate response to at least one biologic DMARD (bDMARD), and patients with failure to 1 versus≥2 bDMARDs. RESULTS: The study selection process finally included 17 articles corresponding to 14 studies, including 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Although the existing literature that compared the response in biologic-naïve patients versus those with inadequate response to at least one bDMARD showed conflicting results, meta-analysis of 6 published studies revealed a significantly higher likelihood of remission (RR=1.3; 95% CI: 1.2-1.5) and low activity disease (RR=1.3; 95% CI: 1.2-1.4) in the biologic-naïve group at week 24. However, differences between groups were not clinically meaningful in all studies and not always maintained after 6 to 12months of treatment. In addition, data from RCT RADIATE and TARGET suggest that the response to IL-6 pathway inhibitors seems to be similar, regardless of the number of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) previously tested. CONCLUSION: Disease activity was more rapidly reduced in the early stages of treatment in biologic-naïve patients. However, near similar efficacy can be expected in patients who experienced a failure of at least one bDMARD (mainly TNFis) beyond the first 6 to 12months of treatment, suggesting that the response occurs independently of the number of prior TNFis.

Relation of the Serum Levels of DKK-1 and Osteoprotegerin with Bone Mass in Tightly Controlled Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between serum levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1) and the annual percent change (Δ%) in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with tightly controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Observational mixed-study. RA patients followed-up with a tight-control strategy were included. Bone densitometries were performed at baseline (T0) and follow-up (T1) and serum levels of OPG and DKK-1 were measured by ELISA also in T0 and T1; additional clinical variables included disease activity measures, and treatment for RA and osteoporosis. Descriptive bivariate and multivariate analyses, stratified by gender, were performed. RESULTS: We included 97 RA patients (70% female, with a mean age of 53 years, and 76% with low activity by DAS28); 95% were treated with DMARDs and 37% with anti-osteoporotic drugs. Mean time between T0 and T1 was 2.7 years. Most patients had their BMD improved. The mean Δ%BMD was +0.42% for lumbar spine, +0.15% for femoral neck and +0.91% for total femur. In men, baseline OPG was significantly associated with higher BMD loss (ß coefficient -0.64) at the femoral neck. In women, DKK-1 was associated with higher BMD loss at the femoral neck (ß coefficient -0.09), and total femur (ß coefficient -0.11); however, DKK-1 was associated with lower BMD loss at the lumbar spine (ß coefficient 0.06). CONCLUSION: In tightly controlled RA patients, we have found no evidence of bone loss. The role of DKK1 and OPG seems small and might be related to sex and location.

Current State, Control, Impact and Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis According to Patient: AR 2020 National Survey. / Estado, control, impacto y manejo actual de la artritis reumatoide según los pacientes: encuesta nacional AR 2020.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse current status, control and impact of RA on patients' lives as well as the management of RA symptoms. METHODS: A structured anonymous online questionnaire was designed and sent to patients with RA, aged 18 years or above living in Spain. Participants were invited though different strategies: 1) ConArtritis and related patients associations; 2) Patients participating in the platform www.in-pacient.es; 3) Links from ConArtritis website and open social networks. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, as well as others related to the objectives were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: We analysed 882 RA patients, 89% women, with a median age of 52 years, 31.9% disease duration <5 years. They reported a mean pain and patient global disease score (0-10) of 5.1 and 4.9 respectively. The rate of patients with many difficulties or inability to perform daily tasks varied from 6.4% to 49.2%. Based on the activity index 56.8% of patients reported high activity. We found a great or severe impact on the emotional well-being in 31.5% of patients, and of 29.2% in the workplace or academic setting. A total of 87.9% are taking some medication for RA, and 17.3% are little / not satisfied with them. In addition, 67.1% take conventional synthetic disease modifying drugs (DMARDs), and 45.9% biological therapies including biosimilars and small molecules. CONCLUSIONS: The current impact of RA on patients' daily lives remains very high. A significant number of patients are not taking DMARDs (conventional synthetic and / or biologics) despite high activity.